It's pretty much me, really.
At work, listening to music while coding, and the Indigo Girls's "Prince of Darkness" came up on iTunes (apparently, per the "last played" attribute, for the first time in two and a half years). To my surprise, my first and primary association with the song is still the fact that the Carleton Knightingales sang it, not that I would have seen them in some sixteen years.

So: Thinking of you, Angie.
It's pretty much me, really.
Turkey undercooked (even though the meat thermometer read fine!). Second attempt at rolls also failed to rise. Sous-chef nauseous, has been unable to help out, will likely not eat. Personal Christmas joy: fading.
It's pretty much me, really.
Turkey went in without a problem. Stuffing prepared to be baked (using rendered turkey fat and turkey giblets). Potatoes boiling. Rolls, however, possibly going to have to be written off; dough seems not to be rising, and proofing a second package of yeast suggests that it, too, is dead.
It's pretty much me, really.
Last year, I was with my brother-in-law's family in Minnesota, and the culture shock was pretty severe. This year, I'm with my parents-in-law in Alabama, where, surprisingly perhaps, the culture shock is not so extreme—Boston-to-Alabama is, perhaps, but in terms of the church service, Methodists are a lot more familiar than evangelicals. (I did have to get up and walk around outside the sanctuary during communion, because it felt too awkward to just sit there. It gave me a chance to look at some lovely, and only slightly homoerotic, portraits of Jesus and the apostles.)

On the other hand, my mother-in-law and I have...somewhat different ideas about cooking. I offered to cook Christmas dinner—in part, I feel like it's a nice gesture to relieve her of having to cook on the holiday, and in part, last year's turkey was kind of a little awful. (This was as much my wife's opinion as mine; she was the one who asked me if I wanted to cook the turkey this year.) So we sent along a shopping list, and tonight I started a little bit of preparation: mixing the spice rub for the turkey, and cubing the several-day-old French bread for the bread pudding.

Now, of course, that bread was going to be for both the bread pudding and the stuffing. But my mother-in-law had bought a bag of Pepperidge Farm cornbread stuffing mix, and it seemed wrong not to use it.

Culture shock does come in many guises.
It's pretty much me, really.
My times continue to be interesting, all around. So instead of commenting on them at all, I link you this image.
It's pretty much me, really.
Today's spam:
Your Mailbox Is Almost Full "CLICK HERE <[unlikely link].ua>" To Update Your Mailbox And Receive New Massage.
On the one hand, who do they think is going to fall for that? No one who's responsible for my mailbox is going to write something that incoherent and ungrammatical, or send me to a website in Ukraine.

On the other hand, I could use New Massage....

(Speaking of tenseness, the previous post in which I said my NDA prevents me from saying how my day is going is of course a complete exaggeration. All the same, I wouldn't expect any genuine work-related news here, if I were you. Heck, document analysis is what my company does; even this very sentence is probably enough for them to find this entry, figure out it's about them, and analyze it for positive/negative content.)
It's pretty much me, really.
Due to a non-disclosure agreement, I can't talk all that much about the new job. That apparently includes how well it's going, because that information would be useful to competitors. But I can safely tell you that yesterday was a day at work, and it looks as if today will be another one.
It's pretty much me, really.
I mentioned to a few people, last night, an interview that Keith Olbermann did with 84-year-old Dorli Rainey, who was pepper-sprayed in Seattle. (That link goes to a photo that the Guardian calls "a powerful image of martyrdom".)

I therefore link it for y'all here, because it's so very much worth watching:

http://current.com/shows/countdown/videos/occupy-seattle-octogenarian-activist-dorli-rainey-on-being-pepper-sprayed-by-seattle-police-importance-of-activism

If you can't stand Keith Olbermann (and, hey, I totally understand that; I view him with a grain of salt and frequent eye-rolling), watch the video anyway, because it's ten minutes long and he only manages to get in three questions, one of which is "how are you feeling today?". (Her answer: "I am feeling great. I feel so energized. It's amazing what a little pepper spray will do for you.") And if you can't watch or listen to the video for whatever reason, there's a transcript posted at that link as well, though I think it's more powerful to hear Rainey tell the story herself.

Anyway, I hope you enjoy.
It's pretty much me, really.
This column in the Ann Arbor Chronicle offers a really nice insight into people vs. corporations at a personal level, its point very much being that the personal level is all there is. Worth reading.
It's pretty much me, really.
So my wife and I have been watching Once Upon a Time, a new ABC show. I pretty much never watch anything on the networks (if you're following a show on a basic cable network, and you miss an episode, it'll be back repeatedly over the next week; with the networks, you have to actually remember to watch), but I have to admit I'm getting pretty caught up in this.

The premise, if you're not familiar with the show, is that the Evil Queen of fairy-tale-land (I'm not sure if it actually has a name) cast a curse which wiped away everyone's happily-ever-afters by transforming the land into the worst possible world, i.e., ours. Which, when you put it that way, kind of makes the show into a really depressing commentary—the whole premise, really, is kind of that things like true love and happy endings can't exist in our world. But, well, anyway, Snow White is now schoolteacher Mary Blanchard; Jiminy Cricket is a therapist; and the queen herself is the monarch-like mayor, Regina Mills. (You can see they had fun with the names; Cinderella becomes Ashley.) There are lots of nice little touches—in the first episode, as they're leaving the classroom, one of Blanchard's students hands her...a pear.

But there is one point on which the show failed me rather badly in this past episode. The danger of unthinkingly casting fairy-tale-land is that you run the risk of your cast being, well, snow-white. Which this cast is, other than the Magic Mirror/editor of the Daily Mirror, Giancarlo Esposito. (Excellent bit of casting, but then, casting Esposito in pretty much anything is excellent casting.) In the most recent episode, spoiler for the first few minutes of Once Upon a Time episode 1.4,  )

I'm certainly going to keep watching; I mostly like what they're doing with the show so far. But seriously, a plea to the creative force behind the show (i.e., the guys from Lost who aren't J.J. Abrams, and Buffy's Jane Espenson): think about what you're doing, OK?

(Also, personal note to Jane: I had no idea you went to graduate school in linguistics! Call me! I've got a screenplay I've been working on....)
It's pretty much me, really.
My brother, with his incredibly unfortunate photo, tweeted a link to this article about Joe Paterno. My wife and I have talked about the scandal enough this week that I'm not going to do so any further here; but my brother is right (as he is more often than you'd expect, but especially about sports) that it's an article worth reading.

linguistic aside about a sentence from the article )

Meanwhile, a great deal of attention is being paid to Herman Cain's alleged acts of sexual harassment. And I have to admit that I think that's a shame, for a number of reasons:
  1. Far, far less interesting to me than whether or not Herman Cain committed any sort of harassment is how unprepared he seems to have been for this fact to come to light.
  2. In the meantime, the question of whether Cain broke a law over a decade ago (in a way that was settled out of court) is overshadowing the much more serious question of whether his campaign flagrantly violated campaign finance laws this year.
  3. Even if the harassment allegations are true, that fact would be, in my mind, quite frankly at the very bottom of the list of reasons that he's incredibly unqualified to be president. The more people talk about the scandal, the less they're talking about his dismissive reference to Uzbeki-beki-beki-stan-stan, the insanity of his 9-9-9 plan (as encapsulated in the best graph ever), his complete loss of words when asked about things like Medicare and the Palestinian Right of Return....
And finally, to make it all better, the 11/10/11 Stephen Colbert sign-off, which you shouldn't watch if you, you know, hate really good singing.
It's pretty much me, really.
I think I'm starting to reset the fact that, when I do a Google Image Search, the first page of hits are taken from Google+. In fact, this happens when I'm searching on a name, even though most of the photos it shows me are people in the circle of that person on Google+, and not the people themselves. It's as if they're somehow overriding their "relevance" algorithm to be a "relevant Google service results and then other relevant results" algorithm.

Meanwhile, Google searches continue to ignore punctuation, so that "2+2" and "2 2" return the same results. This is a frequent irritation for me, since I often search on things where punctuation matters. On the other hand, "Google" and "Google+" are distinct. Which is Google's way of saying "we could include punctuation, but we just don't wanna", and "whatever you might need punctuation for, it's not as important as what we need it for".

(To be fair, Google searches also distinguish "C" from "C++" and "A" from "A+". Still.)
It's pretty much me, really.
Recently, for reasons I dare not even try to understand never mind explain, I found myself singing "What Do We Do With a Drunken Sailor?". Rare as this is, it's even rarer when I'm at a computer, which meant that for the first time I had the presence of mind to try to check something about it.

One of the things that we do with a drunken sailor is "Put him into bed with the captain's daughter". It's a well-known fact that the "captain's daughter" is another name for the cat-o'-nine-tails, which is why this is a punishment for a drunken sailor. Of course, the correlation between things that are well-known and things that are true isn't very strong. So I thought: at last! A chance to actually check this fact!

Wikipedia, of course, confirms it, which does nothing whatsoever to convince me. Actually, I was hoping it would have a reference, but no, it doesn't. The web is similarly willing to confirm it, similarly without any actual convincingness. Google Books seemed like a good place to look, but the fact that Pushkin wrote a short story called "The Captain's Daughter" somewhat overwhelms the search; you can add "whip", but that's more or less the websearch equivalent of begging the question—of course if you add "whip" to the search, you get hits confirming that it's a whip. As it happens, those books are things like 2010's The Book of Pirates and 2002's Pirattitude!: So You Wannna Be a Pirate? Here's How!, which rank somewhere below Wikipedia on sources I'd trust. (Also a page in Anticraft: Knitting, Beading and Stitching for the Slightly Sinister, which tells me "These days, however, a taste of the Captain's Daughter can be quite sexy (assuming everyone is a consenting adult)", just before instructions on how to crochet one. I'm also taking this to be less than authoritative.) What's very much lacking from Google Books is any kind of authentic reference to "the captain's daughter" as a flogging device of any sort.

(I was starting to doubt that the song itself was even authentic, but there are indeed results from the late 1800s for "What Shall We Do With The Drunken Sailor"—for instance, in The Water-Babies, serialized in the early 1860s; and seems to be mentioned with the same title by Dickens in 1856. But I digress.)

My readers being either well-educated in the ways of historical sea shanties, or else as vile a mob of scurvy dogs as ever raised a mug of rum, seem likely to be able to answer with certainty. Why was "the captain's daughter" considered punishment—assuming that that line is as authentically 19th-century as the rest of the song? (Not obviously the case; Google Books only returns one hit for the combination of "What Shall We Do..." and "captain's daughter", and it's from 2010.) I've seen theories—a captain's daughter was simply that unattractive; being found in bed with his daughter by the captain was a guaranteed flogging—but someone out there must know the actual fact of the matter, or know someone who knows.
It's pretty much me, really.
So I found myself caught up in "Alphas", the new Syphy show. (Well, OK, I found myself in front of the television, and "Alphas" was on. It's kind of the same thing.) So far it's a really interesting mix of things that work and things that don't, or perhaps "win and fail" in the modern internet vernacular.

I appreciate the fact that one of the characters speaks Farsi on the phone with her parents; not as a plot point, not even really as a "look we're multicultural" point per se, just because the actress speaks Farsi and so why not really. On the other hand, if they were going to pick a character whose major issue is a lack of self-confidence/self-assertion, I kind of wish they hadn't picked the young female character.

I'm actually enjoying Bill, in part because I think he's one of the stronger actors on the show. He's ex-FBI (or perhaps on leave from the FBI; he still has his badge, and I get the impression that things are deliberately unclear), so he shows actual competence in investigative situations, and I like the way that contrasts with the rest of the team, especially the leader, who's a psychologist and not really a law enforcement leader. But then again, if they were going to pick a character whose superpower is brute strength, I kind of wish they hadn't picked the black man.

I'm fascinated to see what seems to be a decent portrayal of autism on television, though the flip side of that is that the character can be awfully annoying to listen to. (I think that improved by the third episode, or possibly he just grew on me, but I think they're also doing a good job of integrating his dialogue into the rest of the scene.)

But then, if I'm going to be watching a show on Syphy about humans with mental superpowers and the team that catches them and the undercurrent that perhaps the "asylum for treatment" that they're getting sent to is something more nefarious, then I'd just as soon they hadn't cancelled "Painkiller Jane", which had the same premise plus the advantage of getting to stare at Kristanna Loken.

Also, I do genuinely like David Strathairn in this; he's clearly a good actor and he's doing a fine job with the character. But I do kind of wish that if Syphy were going to put together a show about a ragtag band of misfits with the ex-government black man and the computer expert and the one with super-senses and so forth, they hadn't decided to remind me of when that premise was done as Sneakers by casting the guy who played Whistler in it.

General verdict: so far, better than my expectations from the network that's also bringing us "Legend Hunter", about a man who uses his expertise in symbology to search for Excalibur and the lost city of Shambala. And much better than "Falling Skies". We'll see if this pans out.
It's pretty much me, really.
Someone has decided to share his Google+ posts with me. That's terribly kind of him. However, since I'm not in fact on Google+, this amounts to my having been put on someone's mailing list against my will—and I can't even reply to him, since all the mail comes from a "noreply" address at plus.google.com.

There's "unsubscribe" info at the bottom, but, seriously, I'm supposed to unsubscribe from a mailing list I never joined? What the hell? (In any other email, that would count as a spammer trying to verify my address.)

My feelings about Google+ have tilted from "slightly positive, because hey it's not Facebook" to "markedly negative, because seriously you guys are helping a user spam me?". Is there some sensible way to make this stop, perhaps by emailing some support address at Google to say "so when did you turn evil"?
It's pretty much me, really.
Help me out here. Am I a bad person if, when I see a "lost cat" sign, I say "aww!" and feel really bad for the owners, and keep reading the sign, and then get to the point where they say she's an outdoor cat, and then roll my eyes and say "Oh, for Christ's sake"?
It's pretty much me, really.
Last night, the Today Show was apparently here at the NPL convention with a small crew and a reporter. For the icebreaker/mixer, which involved randomizing our table locations, I found myself sitting next to the blonde woman who, as I didn't quite realize, was the show's correspondent. So I introduced myself, and learned her name was Jenna, and that she was from Austin, Texas.

It was much later that evening that I learned who Jenna from Austin was.

Some Con moments are randomer than others.
It's pretty much me, really.
Having been thinking about this post, which is about changing the lyrics when covering songs by someone not of your gender so that you're singing to/about someone of the appropriately opposite gender, I've been wondering about the following.

What songs are there that involve same-sex relationships? Restricting the list to songs that actually charted on the Billboard 100, because, yeah, I know y'all can come up with any number of songs by Girlyman/Coyote Grace/whatever other indie bands are out there. Indeed, let's say any Billboard chart, given that the "Alt 100" isn't necessarily all that indie.

Only songs that are explicitly same-sex, so not counting songs with possible undertones ("Losing My Religion"—got me, look it up) or songs with no gender mentioned but which are presumably same-sex given that the singer is ("Your Song" or, really, anything else by Elton John, or Melissa Etheridge's music, etc.). Edit to clarify: "explicitly same-sex" means, in this case, given the gender of the singer; that is, only the gender of the other person involved needs to be explicitly textual. So for instance, if the singer is male, and is singing about "how much I miss the touch of his lips" or what have you, that counts.

All we could really think of and/or scrounge up from the Internet were Think of 'em yourself first, if you like )

So what do you think; did we miss any?
It's pretty much me, really.
So it's 3am on a Tuesday, which means that I am--as I am wont to do--watching Syphy. For the past few weeks, Monday-night-3am has been Wolf Lake, a 2001 series with Lou Diamond Phillips about werewolves, that I suspect would have lasted longer if it hadn't been somewhat ahead of its time on the paranormal front (i.e., if they hadn't done it four years before Twilight took off). I was kind of enjoying it, actually. Sadly, they're now back to "Masters of Horror", which has a tendency to be either predictable or stupid or both, even when written by the so-called modern masters of horror. The best episodes have been the one based on James Tiptree's "The Screwfly Solution" and, well, admittedly, this one, which is based on H.P. Lovecraft's "Dreams in the Witch-House".

But the thing that makes me actually kind of happy about the episode is the main character's Miskatonic University T-shirt. Miskatonic University seals and symbols are a dime a dozen if you search Google Images, and they're usually the typical boring college seal design. In this production, however, someone who clearly really cares made the T-shirt with this image, with the sun replaced with a skull.

It's small, but I appreciated it.
It's pretty much me, really.
In the words of the Ryan Stiles impersonator who seems to be wielding the gavel in the New York senate: Ayes 33, Nays 29.

Congratulations, New York!

EDIT: Sorry, the instant replay shows that those are the words of the short gray-haired man in front of the Ryan Stiles impersonator. I think, though, that "the ayes have it" were his words.