(no subject)
Oct. 9th, 2003 11:51 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
tahnanI've been reading some of the articles by people who want to defend marriage from encroachment by people who are gay or polyamorous, in honor of Defense of Marriage Week. One such article ends:
If we cannot stand and defend this ground, then face it: The marriage debate is over. Dan Quayle was wrong. We lost.
Setting aside partisan lines: how desperate does your position have to be for you to invoke Dan Quayle as a source of intelligence and authority?
If we cannot stand and defend this ground, then face it: The marriage debate is over. Dan Quayle was wrong. We lost.
Setting aside partisan lines: how desperate does your position have to be for you to invoke Dan Quayle as a source of intelligence and authority?