The most well known play from "All in the Timing" is "The Philadelphia," which is about a man who thinks he is just having a bad day, only to be informed by his friend that he has actually fallen into a metaphysical hole called a Philadelphia. In a Philadelphia everything goes wrong: the taxis don't take you where you want to go, the newsstands don't sell your newspaper, and no matter what you order at a restaurant, you'll end up with a cheesesteak. -from Wikipedia, "David Ives"
So I stopped by the food court in the building next to my office to get lunch. The food is surprisingly decent; but the last two times I went there I was overcharged. (Once, a double-charge for a coke; once, a double-charge for "protein", i.e. the chicken in the chicken nachos.) This time, I felt ready: this order got placed at the electronic kiosk, which helpfully printed out a receipt:
"I've got them now," I thought. "I'm not buying anything but this, so here I am, with my $5.01 ready. If she tries to charge me for the wrong thing, or she reads '$5.01' and punches it in and charges me that plus tax, or whatever, I'm ready."
Finally, I had my food and went to the cashier, who rang it in. "$5.02," she told me.
"Er--" I said. "This receipt said $5.01..."
"There's tax," she said. "$5.02."
And as I fumbled around for another penny, I took another look at the tax. $4.69, plus $0.33 tax, is...kind of pretty much not the $5.01 that was printed on the receipt I was holding.
Who the hell programs a machine to add wrong?
So I stopped by the food court in the building next to my office to get lunch. The food is surprisingly decent; but the last two times I went there I was overcharged. (Once, a double-charge for a coke; once, a double-charge for "protein", i.e. the chicken in the chicken nachos.) This time, I felt ready: this order got placed at the electronic kiosk, which helpfully printed out a receipt:
- Subtotal: $4.69
- Tax: $0.33
- Total: $5.01
"I've got them now," I thought. "I'm not buying anything but this, so here I am, with my $5.01 ready. If she tries to charge me for the wrong thing, or she reads '$5.01' and punches it in and charges me that plus tax, or whatever, I'm ready."
Finally, I had my food and went to the cashier, who rang it in. "$5.02," she told me.
"Er--" I said. "This receipt said $5.01..."
"There's tax," she said. "$5.02."
And as I fumbled around for another penny, I took another look at the tax. $4.69, plus $0.33 tax, is...kind of pretty much not the $5.01 that was printed on the receipt I was holding.
Who the hell programs a machine to add wrong?
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-29 10:01 pm (UTC)My theory is that it's rounding up in one place, correctly realizing that there's no fractional cents in the tax, but just doing that at display time, and then truncating for the display of the total.
Because the inability to do addition in software is just too frightening to bear the thought of.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-29 10:40 pm (UTC)Inquiring minds want to know, Tahnan. Your assignment tomorrow is to buy something such that the calculated tax should round down (say, a total of $4.75 or so) and see what the receipt says :)
Maybe they have a rounding algorithm that says 'round to the nearest odd # of cents'. It'd be silly, but that doesn't always stop people....
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-29 10:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-29 11:34 pm (UTC)For what anecdotal evidence is worth and all that, but I figure signed anecdotal that agrees with the original poster beats anonymous comments. :-)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-30 02:44 am (UTC)(In my second act of Wikipedia grumpiness, I deleted some random production of Words, Words, Words from the Words, Words, Words page.)
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-30 04:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-31 01:10 am (UTC)On the other hand, the assertion is at least undermined by a passage a few paragraphs down: "Among the best-known of his one-act comedies are Sure Thing, Words, Words, Words, Variations on the Death of Trotsky, Philip Glass Buys a Loaf of Bread, and The Universal Language."
I actually considered deleting the part about The Philadelphia, since it's not only unsubstantiated but doesn't really fit in that spot in the article. But then I decided it was rather rude to delete something that had just been linked to.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-29 10:56 pm (UTC)I can only assume that they're calculating
$4.69 x 0.06 PA sales tax = 0.2814
+
4.69 x 0.01 Philly and Pittsburg supplement = 0.0469
=
0.3283 = 0.33
but if you round them down, in that Being Good To Your Customer way, before adding them up, instead of being smart about it, you get
0.28 + 0.04 = 0.32 tax.
Which I agree, still makes no sense. But none the less.
(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-29 10:56 pm (UTC)Bah!
Date: 2007-01-30 12:38 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-30 03:30 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-01-30 08:13 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2007-02-01 01:28 am (UTC)