The Year in Utter Lack of Review
Dec. 30th, 2009 05:25 amI love New Year's; not the holiday per se, but I've always been a voracious consumer of end-of-year lists. When I listened to popular music (i.e., the early-to-mid '80s), I hung on every note of the Casey Kasem year-end countdown. I'd await the announcement of Time's Man/Woman/Planet/Machine of the Year with bated breath. I love reading lists of the ten best movies, TV moments, underdog sports stories, albums I've never heard of...it never mattered, really. Taking stock: I've always adored it.
But not this year. I've read a few things here and there, but found myself bored, for instance, with Phillip Niemeyer's "piece of fluff" (to use Arnold Zwicky's term). I haven't sought out anyone's list of anything. I, basically, don't care.
Part of that, I think, is that often around this time I'm at my parents' house (or, similarly, my in-laws'), with little to do but pick up the year-end issue of Time and flip through it, or poke around the web looking at this and that. I mean, I'm still poking around the web, but still.
But that's ultimately only part of it. I think that most of it is that this has been the worst year of the decade for me, and I've got to be honest, it hasn't been that great a decade. (I mean, married, yes; PhD, yes; cats, yes; but all in all.) It's hard for me to name anything good at all that's happened this year, and the few good things that did occur seemed to go sour in one way or another, like my one-semester job this past semester, or the new "socialist" president who I feel has utterly failed to live up to my unrealistic hopes that he might be at least half as progressive as his campaign promised. It's to the point that I find myself dismissing someone else's list of great things from the decade (and sniping in the livejournal of an innocent bystander; sorry about that) because I just can't really see anything good in most of it. (Oh, gee, great, High Definition TVs and iPods. Tell you what, mister: buy me one, and I'll appreciate it as an accomplishment of the decade.)
So unlike people who can say things like "I don't want this year to end" in their year-end summaries—and I'm happy for them, I really am, or at least as happy as I can manage these days—I can't say that at all. I want this year to end. I want this year to end, to the point that I don't even want to write a year-end summary. I don't want to think about the past year. I just want it the hell over with.
But not this year. I've read a few things here and there, but found myself bored, for instance, with Phillip Niemeyer's "piece of fluff" (to use Arnold Zwicky's term). I haven't sought out anyone's list of anything. I, basically, don't care.
Part of that, I think, is that often around this time I'm at my parents' house (or, similarly, my in-laws'), with little to do but pick up the year-end issue of Time and flip through it, or poke around the web looking at this and that. I mean, I'm still poking around the web, but still.
But that's ultimately only part of it. I think that most of it is that this has been the worst year of the decade for me, and I've got to be honest, it hasn't been that great a decade. (I mean, married, yes; PhD, yes; cats, yes; but all in all.) It's hard for me to name anything good at all that's happened this year, and the few good things that did occur seemed to go sour in one way or another, like my one-semester job this past semester, or the new "socialist" president who I feel has utterly failed to live up to my unrealistic hopes that he might be at least half as progressive as his campaign promised. It's to the point that I find myself dismissing someone else's list of great things from the decade (and sniping in the livejournal of an innocent bystander; sorry about that) because I just can't really see anything good in most of it. (Oh, gee, great, High Definition TVs and iPods. Tell you what, mister: buy me one, and I'll appreciate it as an accomplishment of the decade.)
So unlike people who can say things like "I don't want this year to end" in their year-end summaries—and I'm happy for them, I really am, or at least as happy as I can manage these days—I can't say that at all. I want this year to end. I want this year to end, to the point that I don't even want to write a year-end summary. I don't want to think about the past year. I just want it the hell over with.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-12-30 01:01 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-12-30 02:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-12-30 04:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-12-30 04:48 pm (UTC)Well played, sir, well played.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-12-30 04:12 pm (UTC)Also, shouldn't that be "baited breath"? *ducks*
(Seriously, I'm sorry your year blew. That is the beauty of New Year's -- an artificial fresh start.)
(no subject)
Date: 2009-12-30 04:18 pm (UTC)And no, it's only "baited breath" if I've been eating worms, which, admittedly, is pretty much metaphorically accurate.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-12-30 05:23 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2009-12-30 06:35 pm (UTC)Don't say I'm not looking out for you.
(no subject)
Date: 2009-12-30 08:11 pm (UTC)I hope this next year is better for you. C. and I and many of your friends will try very hard to help it be so. You are an excellent pedagog and an intellectual - I have faith that you will find the appreciation for those that you are richly overdue.
Good luck with 2010 my friend!
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-01 03:46 am (UTC)--Norvin
p.s.--hey, you got into NELS! That was an achievement (or an accomplishment? definitely not an activity), and it can't have done your CV any harm.
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-01 08:42 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-02 05:23 am (UTC)http://www.buzzle.com/showImage.asp?image=64023
(I know it seem shady that an anonymous poster is feeding you some random link, but I just like being anonymous when it comes to blogs. Nothing personal.)
(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-02 08:11 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2010-01-03 03:11 pm (UTC)It sounds like you were not having a great moment when you wrote this. I hope you get a preponderance of better ones in the year to come.