Worst RPG ever
Apr. 11th, 2003 02:23 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
tahnanOK. The following link is not worksafe. Not remotely. Also: it's more than a little vulgar in places, though often as not that's because of the subject of the view.
But it's incredibly funny. And it's amazing that any RPG can possibly be this bad. But it is.
The RPG.net review of F.A.T.A.L.
To give you an idea:
Category: Affronts to both Man and G-d
Cost: 1d6/3d10 SAN
Pages: 901
If you have spare time, and you're in a place where you can open it, and you're not too easily offended--because, dear god, the game is offensive--it's well worth reading. The review, not the game. I did skim the game. It's not worth reading. The reviewers hit pretty much everything of interest.
But it's incredibly funny. And it's amazing that any RPG can possibly be this bad. But it is.
The RPG.net review of F.A.T.A.L.
To give you an idea:
Category: Affronts to both Man and G-d
Cost: 1d6/3d10 SAN
Pages: 901
If you have spare time, and you're in a place where you can open it, and you're not too easily offended--because, dear god, the game is offensive--it's well worth reading. The review, not the game. I did skim the game. It's not worth reading. The reviewers hit pretty much everything of interest.
![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png){kind=small}
(no subject)
Date: 2003-04-11 01:30 am (UTC)I do think the review as a whole went on far too long, though. Should have been trimmed down by at least a third.