Newsweek on obesity
Aug. 20th, 2004 03:02 amThis week's Newsweek's cover story is titled What You Don't Know About Fat. There was a lot in there that I didn't know about fat, and the article said a number of interesting things about the biology of the fat cell and how a better understanding of it is giving researchers insights into how to combat morbid obesity.
I was fascinated by the sentence "The point of this research isn't to prove that obesity is bad for you; the evidence of that is statistical, and unassailable", mostly because I've certainly seen articles assailing that. (I'm by no means a doctor; I'm not really in any position to evaluate the claims.)
But by far my favorite sentence of the article was this one, which appeared after an enumeration of some of the health risks:
What an incredibly inane statement. I'm trying hard to imagine the hordes of men and women across America saying things like "I've got no plans for this weekend. Maybe I'll try to become obese" or "I just feel too darned socially accepted these days; serious weight gain ought to take care of that." And I'm failing.
And then the press wonders why we don't trust them.
I was fascinated by the sentence "The point of this research isn't to prove that obesity is bad for you; the evidence of that is statistical, and unassailable", mostly because I've certainly seen articles assailing that. (I'm by no means a doctor; I'm not really in any position to evaluate the claims.)
But by far my favorite sentence of the article was this one, which appeared after an enumeration of some of the health risks:
For anyone thinking of becoming obese, this ought to give them pause.
What an incredibly inane statement. I'm trying hard to imagine the hordes of men and women across America saying things like "I've got no plans for this weekend. Maybe I'll try to become obese" or "I just feel too darned socially accepted these days; serious weight gain ought to take care of that." And I'm failing.
And then the press wonders why we don't trust them.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-20 02:44 am (UTC)Still, I wouldn't bet above twenty on it.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-20 05:29 am (UTC)How...I have no words for that statement.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-20 07:51 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-20 05:41 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-20 08:56 am (UTC)As for "obesity is bad for you," I would argue that yes, it's pretty unassailable that obesity is bad for you. The question is, how do you define obesity? Fat != obese, although that seems to be the prevailing attitude these days.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-20 08:59 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-20 09:43 am (UTC)I know you're distinguishing,
Soon I'll try to post some reading material for whoever's interested.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-20 02:21 pm (UTC)fatness not proven unhealthy
Date: 2004-08-20 04:45 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-21 11:50 am (UTC)I guess you're right that people do these days, but I actually don't. Where I come from, "obese" means that you're carrying around so much weight that even an otherwise healthy heart and knees complain when you try to climb stairs. I've known people like that, and I can't possibly believe that they're as healthy as average-weight or thinner people with the same diet and exercise habits.
(no subject)
Date: 2004-08-21 11:51 am (UTC)