No, no, not "eat it"!
Dec. 8th, 2005 03:44 amIn the category of things that just make me sad: ClassKC, "Citizens for Literary Standards in Schools", is out to ban books from high school curricula. Well, of course, I suppose; though as Jon Carroll points out, it's so terribly kind of them to put the offensive parts on a website where any schoolchild can find it, without all that needless and annoying context.
I do love their overcapitalized warning: "IN NO EVENT WILL ClassKC.org BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DAMAGES OF ANY KIND resulting from viewing or any other use of this material." I wonder, really, what sort of damages can be caused by all this evil, evil reading.
But you know. Books like Beloved are bad because they deal with ghosts: "Anything dead coming back to life hurts" is one of the cited offensive lines. And Ender's Game contains strong language, like: "Eat it Ender, I'm coming with you." Needless to say, they ask of Lord of the Flies, "Does this sound like the type of book that would inspire your freshman?"
Fortunately, they make quite clear that comparing these works to Shakespeare is ridiculous: "Shakespeare's works contain neither a pervasive nor gratuitous amount of sex, violence, or vulgarity as do many of the other required reading assignments." Bear that in mind: Shakespeare's works never contain ghosts. And never have off-color allusions or contain the word "hell". And never end with an unhappy, dark tone in which everyone's dead.
That, really, is the sad part.
I do love their overcapitalized warning: "IN NO EVENT WILL ClassKC.org BE LIABLE TO YOU FOR ANY DAMAGES OF ANY KIND resulting from viewing or any other use of this material." I wonder, really, what sort of damages can be caused by all this evil, evil reading.
But you know. Books like Beloved are bad because they deal with ghosts: "Anything dead coming back to life hurts" is one of the cited offensive lines. And Ender's Game contains strong language, like: "Eat it Ender, I'm coming with you." Needless to say, they ask of Lord of the Flies, "Does this sound like the type of book that would inspire your freshman?"
Fortunately, they make quite clear that comparing these works to Shakespeare is ridiculous: "Shakespeare's works contain neither a pervasive nor gratuitous amount of sex, violence, or vulgarity as do many of the other required reading assignments." Bear that in mind: Shakespeare's works never contain ghosts. And never have off-color allusions or contain the word "hell". And never end with an unhappy, dark tone in which everyone's dead.
That, really, is the sad part.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-08 11:26 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-08 02:43 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-08 02:49 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-08 02:59 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-08 03:08 pm (UTC)Gregory: That shows thee a weak slave; for the weakest goes to the wall.
Sampson: 'Tis true; and therefore women, being the weaker vessels, are ever thrust to the wall; therefore I will push Montague's men from the wall and thrust his maids to the wall.
--Romeo and Juliet, Act I, Scene 1
Right off the bat. And this is arguably the most produced play in secondary school drama programs. Let's not even get into the "open-arse" and the "poppering pear."
Thank God that prudes have no ear for innuendo.
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-08 03:45 pm (UTC)Just because I have to link it every so often.
Date: 2005-12-08 05:34 pm (UTC)Re: Just because I have to link it every so often.
Date: 2005-12-08 06:37 pm (UTC)Re: Just because I have to link it every so often.
Date: 2005-12-09 03:29 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-08 06:35 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-08 07:10 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-08 06:42 pm (UTC)Me: "Um, Tolkien, maybe?"
Him: "I don't think stories about (voice drips with sarcasm) hobbits are going to be great literature, no."
Me: "Because stories about druids and air spirits, and fairy queens having sex with donkeys, are so much more literary?"
Him: "Let's move on."
(no subject)
Date: 2005-12-08 11:18 pm (UTC)